ANTH 442/542 - Northwest Coast Archaeology

Fall Term 2007, Professor Madonna L. Moss 

Haida carved dish (Queen Charlotte Islands) & Tlingit dagger (Port Mulgrave) in 1787 engraving

Course Description

Course Goals

Readings

Where and When

Major Northwest Coast Groups

Disability

Required Reading

Course Format & Requirements

ANTH 542

Other Good Books

Class Schedule

Professor Moss's homepage

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This class examines the more than 10,000 year old archaeological record of the Northwest Coast of North America, the culture area extending from southeast Alaska to coastal British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and northern California. This region has fascinated anthropologists for over 100 years because its indigenous peoples have developed distinctive cultures based on fishing, hunting, and gathering economies. We begin by establishing the ecological and ethnographic background for the region, and then study how these have shaped archaeologists' ideas about the past. We study the contents of sites and consider the relationship between data, interpretation, and theory. Throughout the term, we discuss the dynamics of contact and colonialism and how these have impacted understandings of the recent and more distant pasts of these societies. This course will also prepare you to understand and evaluate Northwest Coast archaeological news within the context of different jurisdictions. We will visit some archaeological sites and a cultural center on the Oregon coast. Another goal of the course is to prepare you for a lifetime of appreciating Northwest Coast archaeology.

WHERE AND WHEN

Class: 2:00-3:50 pm, Monday and Wednesday in Room 360 Condon Hall
Instructor: Dr. Madonna L. Moss
Office hours: after class until 4:30, and on Friday, 12:00-1:00 pm or by appointment
327 Condon, 346-6076;
mmoss@uoregon.edu
Homepage with link to Course Website:
http://uoregon.edu/~mmoss/ 

REQUIRED READING: ANTH 442/542 Readings on Blackboard

GOOD BOOKS

Bernick, Kathryn (1998) Hidden Dimensions: the Cultural Significance of Wetland Archaeology. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

Carlson, Roy L., editor (1983) Indian Art Traditions of the Northwest Coast. Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.

Carlson, Roy L. and Luke Dala Bona, editors (1996) Early Human Occupation in British Columbia. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.

Fedje, D. W. and R. W. Mathewes, editors (2005) Haida Gwaii: Human History and Environment from the Time of Loon to the Time of the Iron People. UBC Press, Vancouver.

Losey, Robert J., editor (2000) Changing Landscapes: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Coquille Cultural Preservation Conference, 1999. Coquille Indian Tribe, North Bend, OR.

Lyman, R. Lee (1991) Prehistory of the Oregon Coast. Academic Press, San Diego.

Matson R.G. and Gary Coupland (1995) Prehistory of the Northwest Coast. Academic Press, San Diego.

Matson, R.G., G. Coupland, and Q. Mackie, editors (2003) Emerging from the Mist: Studies in Northwest Coast Culture History. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

McMillan, Alan D. (1999) Since the Time of the Transformers: the Ancient Heritage of the Nuu-chah-nulth, Ditidaht, and Makah. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

Sobel, E. A., D.A. Trieu Gahr, and K. M. Ames (2006) Household Archaeology on the Northwest Coast. International Monographs in Prehistory Archaeology Series 16, Ann Arbor, MI.

Stewart, Hilary (1996) Stone, Bone, Antler, and Shell: Artifacts of the Northwest Coast. Douglas and McIntyre, Vancouver, and University of Washington Press, Seattle.

Stewart, Hilary (1984) Cedar: Tree of Life to the Northwest Indians. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

Stewart, Hilary (1982) Indian Fishing: Early Methods on the Northwest Coast. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

Suttles, Wayne (1990) Handbook of North American Indians vol 7, Northwest Coast. Smithsonian Institution, Washington. (in Reference section of the Knight Library).

COURSE GOALS

The Northwest Coast is a unique world region that has become a model for the anthropological study of "complex hunter-gatherers" (although we will critique this concept and its usage). The ethnographic records of portions of the Northwest Coast are voluminous, and inevitably affect how we archaeologists interpret the archaeological record--- for better or worse. Several things I hope you will gain from this course:

  • understanding why the Northwest Coast is a unique world region
  • in-depth appreciation for the diversity of geography, peoples, and cultures of the Northwest Coast
  • understanding what we do and do not know about the culture history of different Northwest Coast subregions
  • critical awareness of how archaeologists use ethnographic data as analogs for the more distant past and some of the problems and potential of various approaches
  • knowledge of current threats to Northwest Coast archaeological sites
  • awareness of the significance of archaeological research to the region's contemporary residents, particularly Native Americans and First Nations 

DISABILITY

If you have a documented disability and will need accommodation in this course, please contact me soon. Please also request the Counselor for Students with Disabilities send a letter verifying your disability. 

MAJOR NORTHWEST COAST GROUPS

The major indigenous groups whose archaeology we will study are listed below, ordered from north to south (approximately) and listed with their associated territories and language group. You can find a pronunciation guide to some of these at http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/abed/map.htm. (Scroll down to below the map).

FIRST NATION

GEOGRAPHIC TERRITORY

LANGUAGE PHYLUM

Yakutat Tlingit

Yakutat Bay

Tlingit

Tlingit

southeast Alaska (Alexander Archipelago & mainland)

Tlingit

Kaigani Haida

southern two-thirds of Prince of Wales Archipelago

Haida

Haida

Queen Charlotte Islands (Gwaii Haanas)

Haida

Nisga'a

Nass River

Tsimshian

Gitksan

Skeena River

Tsimshian

Coast Tsimshian

Prince Rupert Harbor, lower Nass and Skeena (Prince Rupert)

Tsimshian

Southern Tsimshian

Kitkatla, Princess Royal Island

Tsimshian

Haisla

Kitimat River and Gardner Channel

Wakashan

Haihais

Milbanke Sound

Wakashan

Heiltsuk (Bella Bella)

Fitzhugh Sound

Wakashan

Oowekeeno

Rivers Inlet

Wakashan

Nuxalk (Bella Coola)

Burke Channel and Dean Channel

Salishan

Kwakwaka'wakw (Kwakiutl)

N Vancouver Island & mainland along Queen Charlotte and Johnstone Straits

Wakashan

Nuu-chah-nulth (Nootka)

80% of western Vancouver Island

Wakashan

Makah

northwest tip of Olympic Peninsula

Wakashan

Quileute

Olympic Peninsula, Hoh and Soleduck Rivers

Chimakuan

Quinault

Olympic Peninsula, Queets and Quinault Rivers

Salishan

Chemakum

Admiralty Inlet (Port Townsend)

Chimakuan

Coast Salish (>16 groups: Comox, Sechelt, Halkomelem, Nooksack, Clallam, Lushootseed,Twana

Strait of Georgia, Puget Sound, lower Fraser (Vancouver, Victoria, Seattle, Tacoma)

Salishan

Chehalis

Grays Harbor

Salishan

Chinook

lower Columbia River (Astoria)

Penutian

Tillamook

Tillamook Head to Siletz Bay

Salishan

Yaquina, Alsea

Otter Rock to Cape Perpetua (Newport, Waldport, Yachats)

Penutian

Siuslaw

Siuslaw River (Florence)

Penutian

Umpqua

Umpqua River (Reedsport, Winchester Bay)

Penutian

Coos (Hanis & Miluk)

Coos Bay

Penutian

Coquille

Coquille River (Bandon)

lower Penutian; upper Athapaskan

Tututni

southern Oregon coast (Gold Beach, Brookings)

Athapaskan

Tolowa

northern California, Smith River (Crescent City)

Athapaskan

Yurok

Klamath River (Trinidad)

Algic

Wiyot

Humboldt Bay (Eureka)

Algic

 

 CLASS SCHEDULE The readings should be read BEFORE the class where they are listed. Articles are indicated by author's name and date.
WEEK

DATE

TOPIC
READING
1
9/24

Course business and introduction

9/26

Archaeological fieldwork on the Northwest Coast, an introduction to environment and ecology

Suttles 1990

2
10/1

Environmental and Ethnographic Diversity, (Film: Esther Shea: The Bear Stands Up)

Moss 2003

10/3

Oregon Coast Overview; briefing for field trip.

Moss & Erlandson 1998a; Ivy & Byram 2001

10/6

Saturday Field Trip to Oregon Coast Archaeological Sites

bring rainjacket, waterproof boots, hat, LUNCH, etc.

3
10/8

Contact & Colonial History

Cole & Darling 1990; Boyd 1990

10/10

NW Coast Anthropology as Part of the History of Colonialism

Carlson 1990; Moss & Wasson 1998; Butler 2007

4
10/15

Test #1, followed by lab visit to see Northwest Coast shell midden samples, animal bone, etc.

10/17

Initial Settlement I (Film: Kuwoot yas.ein: His Spirit is Looking out from the Cave)

Fedje et al. 2004; Kemp et al. 2007

5
10/22

Initial Settlement II

Carlson 1996a; Fedje et al. 2005

10/24

Mid-Holocene Developments

Carlson 1996b; Moss et al. 2007

6

10/29

Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and Interpreting the Archaeological Record - Shell Middens and Clam Gardens (Film: Ancient Sea Gardens)

Moss 1993; Harper et al. 2002

10/31

Northwest Coast Fishing - Weirs and Traps

Moss & Erlandson 1998b; Byram 1998

7
11/5

The Gulf of Georgia Sequence in Coast Salish territory; Labret Wearing at Different Times and Places

Mitchell 1990; Moss 1999

11/7

Test #2, followed by discussion of research papers, thesis statements, writing rubric, group process

8
11/12

Ozette Archaeology & Perishable Technologies - Makah

McMillan 1999:85-93; Croes 2003; Abstract and References Due

11/14

Film: Ozette Gift from the Past & the 1999 Makah Whale Hunt

Makah Tribe's website on whaling, Monks 2003; Bowechop 2004

9
11/19

Hoko River; Research Papers: discuss abstracts, thesis statements, sources

McMillan 1999:93-98; Draft Research Papers Due to Peers

11/21

Northwest Coast Warfare, Forts, and Defensive Sites

Moss & Erlandson 1992

10
11/26

The Auctioning of B.C. Heritage - the Case of Marpole Carvings; Draft Papers to be discussed in groups

Articles in The Midden (2007); Peer Evaluations Due; bring in marked-up copies of your peers' research papers

11/28

Course Retrospective, Evaluations, Test #3

11
12/5

Research Papers due at NOON

READINGS

The articles are listed by the date by which they should be read. All are available on Blackboard except the Makah Whaling website (see URL listed below).

For 9/26
Suttles, W. (1990) Environment. In: Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7, Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 16-29. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.

For 10/1
Moss, M. L. (2003) Introduction to the Northwest Coast. Ms. in possession of the author, Eugene, OR.

For 10/3
Moss, M. L. and J. M. Erlandson (1998a) Early Holocene Adaptations of the Southern Northwest Coast. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 20(1):13-25. 

Ivy, D. and S. Byram (2001) Coquille Cultural Heritage and Wetland Archaeology. In: Enduring Records: the Environmental and Cultural Heritage of Wetlands, edited by B. Purdy, pp. 120-131. Oxbow Books, Oxford.

For 10/8
Cole, D. and D. Darling (1990) History of the Early Period. In: Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7, Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 119-134. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.

Boyd, R. T. (1990) Demographic History 1774-1874. In: Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7, Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 135-148. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.   

For 10/10
Carlson, R. L. (1990) History of Research in Archaeology. In: Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7, Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 107-115. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.

Moss, M. L. and G. B. Wasson, Jr. (1998) Intimate Relations with the Past: the Story of an Athapaskan Village on the Southern Northwest Coast of North America. World Archaeology 29(3):317-332.

Butler, V. L. (2007) Relic Hunting, Archaeology, and Loss of Native American Heritage at The Dalles. Oregon Historical Quarterly (in press).

For 10/17
Fedje, D.W., E. J. Dixon, Q. Mackie, and T. H. Heaton. (2004) Late Wisconsin environments and archaeological visibility on the northern Northwest Coast . In: Entering America: Northeast Asia and Beringia before the Last Glacial Maximum, edited by D. B. Madsen, pp. 97-138. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

Kemp et al.  (2007) Genetic Analysis of Early Holocene Skeletal Remains from Alaska and its Implications for the Settlement of the Americas. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 132 (in press).

For 10/22
Carlson, R. L. (1996a) Introduction to Early Human Occupation in British Columbia. In Early Human Occupation in British Columbia, edited by R. L Carlson and L.Dalla Bona, pp. 3-10. UBC Press, Vancouver.

Fedje, D. W., A. P. Mackie, R. J. Wigen, Q. Mackie, and C. Lake (2005) Kilgii Gwaay: An Early Maritime in the South of Haida Gwaii. In: Haida Gwaii: Human History and Environment from the Time of Loon to the Time of the Iron People, edited by D. W. Fedje and R. W. Mathewes, pp. 187-203. UBC Press, Vancouver

For 10/24
Carlson, Roy L. (1996b) The Later Prehistory of British Columbia. In Early Human Occupation in British Columbia, edited by R. L. Carlson and Luke Dalla Bona, pp. 215-226. UBC Press, Vancouver.

Moss, M. L., D. M. Peteet, and C. Whitlock. 2007. Mid-Holocene Culture and Climate on the Northwest Coast of North America. In: Climate Change and Cultural Dynamics: a Global Perspective on Mid-Holocene Transitions, edited by D. G. Anderson, K. A. Maasch, and D. H. Sandweiss, pp. 491-529. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

For 10/29
Moss, M. L. (1993) Shellfish, Gender, and Status on the Northwest Coast of North America: Reconciling Archeological, Ethnographic and Ethnohistorical Records of the Tlingit. American Anthropologist 95(3):631-652.

Harper, J. R., J. Haggarty, and M. C. Morris (2002) Broughton Archipelago: Clam Terrace Survey. Coastal and Ocean Resources, Inc., Sidney, B.C.

For 10/31
Moss, M. L. and J. M. Erlandson (1998b) A Comparative Chronology of Northwest Coast Fishing Features. In Hidden Dimensions: the Cultural Significance of Wetland Archaeology, edited by K. Bernick, pp. 180-198. UBC Press, Vancouver.

Byram, R. S. (1998) Fishing Weirs in Oregon Coast Estuaries. In Hidden Dimensions: the Cultural Significance of Wetland Archaeology, edited by K. Bernick, pp. 199-219. UBC Press, Vancouver. 

For 11/5
Mitchell, Donald (1990) Prehistory of the Coast of Southern British Columbia and Northern Washington.
In: Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7, Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 340-358. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.

Moss, M. L. (1999) George Catlin among the Nayas: Understanding the Practice of Labret Wearing on the Northwest Coast. Ethnohistory 46(1):31-65. 

For 11/12
McMillan, Alan D. (1999) Since the Time of the Transformers: the Ancient Heritage of the Nuu-chah-nulth, Ditidaht, and Makah, pp. 85-93. UBC Press, Vancouver.

Croes, D. R. (2003) Northwest Coast Wet-Site Artifacts: a Key to Understanding Resource Procurement, Storage, Management, and Exchange. In: Emerging from the Mist: Studies in Northwest Coast Culture History, edited by R. G. Matson, G. Coupland, and Q. Mackie, pp. 51-75. UBC Press, Vancouver.

For 11/14
Monks, G. G. (2003) The Cultural Taphonomy of Nuu-chah-nulth Whale Bone Assemblages. In: Emerging from the Mist: Studies in Northwest Coast Culture History, edited by R. G. Matson, G. Coupland, and Q. Mackie, pp. 188-212. UBC Press, Vancouver.

Bowechop, J. (2004) Contemporary Makah Whaling. In: Coming to Shore: Northwest Coast Ethnology, Traditions, and Visions, edited by M. Mauzé, M. E. Harkin, and S. Kan, pp. 407-419. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

Makah Tribe's Website on Whaling: http://www.makah.com/whaling.htm

For 11/19
McMillan, Alan D. (1999) Since the Time of the Transformers: the Ancient Heritage of the Nuu-chah-nulth, Ditidaht, and Makah, pp. 93-98. UBC Press, Vancouver.

For 11/21
Moss, M.L. and J.M. Erlandson (1992) Forts, Refuge Rocks, and Defensive Sites: the Antiquity of Warfare along the North Pacific Coast of North America. Arctic Anthropology 29(2):73-90.

For 11/26
The Auctioning of B. C. Heritage, articles by D. Welsh, R. Kenny & J. Spafford, S. Rowley, and E. McLay, in vol. 39(1), pp. 6-25 of The Midden, Archaeological Society of British Columbia, Vancouver.

COURSE FORMAT & REQUIREMENTS

We cover a great deal of material in class, and it is important for you to keep up with the reading. Do the reading before you come to class. Class meetings serve several important functions that cannot be replicated by doing the reading on your own or by talking to someone who attended class. Over the past 27 years I have taken thousands of color slides of Northwest Coast sites and artifacts. Although the saying goes "a picture is worth a thousand words," in many cases, archaeological pictures require hundreds (if not thousands) of words to explain. While the pictures will be available through Blackboard after class, the words will not. It is important to your learning (and to your grade) that you attend class. I assume everyone is doing the reading and I will not duplicate that material in class. During class we discuss important aspects of reading, highlight key concepts, and I expand upon and elaborate on certain topics based on my on-going research.

Grades will be based on a percentage of 200 points:

3 Tests @ 30 points each

90 points

10/15, 11/7, 11/28

Participation & Attendance

20 points

on-going

Research Paper Abstract & References

10 points

11/12

Peer Evaluations of 2 Papers

10 points

11/26

Research Paper

70 points

12/5

Tests
Three tests are scheduled. The tests will be composed of a variety of questions: multiple choice, map questions, slide identifications, short answer and possibly short essays. The tests are spaced across the term in an effort to insure sustained engagement with the material; this format should prevent students from falling behind. There will be no make-up tests; mark your calendar now. Click here to locate the place on this webpage that will take you to a set of valuable maps produced by former graduate student Barbara Bundy.

Participation

To attain the full 20 points for participation, you must have either perfect attendance or 1 absence and excellent classroom participation. Please be on time to class; I like to start promptly. Classroom participation is judged not only by the frequency of participation, but the quality of participation. Poorly timed or disruptive comments or behavior will detract from you score. To evaluate everyone fairly, I hope to learn your names within the first two weeks of class. Hopefully, everyone will feel comfortable speaking up in class.

High quality participation can involve: being prepared for discussion having completed the reading, making relevant comments, asking clarifying questions, moving discussion forward, using evidence to support a position, presenting factual information, making analogies, and recognizing and identifying contradictions.

Negative behavior includes being unprepared for class, being late for class, making irrelevant comments, not paying attention, distracting others, interrupting, monopolizing discussion, or making a personal attack.

Email - You may email me, although I'd prefer that you talk to me in person. If you choose to email me, please put ANTH 442 or ANTH 542 in the subject line, since I receive a large volume of email. Write me a concise message with a specific question or comment. If your question requires more than a single sentence response or a more extended exchange, please talk to me in person. Since I do not do email every day, in case of emergency, it is better to telephone me. For this class, I will not accept papers by email. I may email you as a member of the class with an occasional announcement or reference to a reading or URL.

ASSIGNMENTS

General Guidelines
Papers must be the product of original work and thinking, and they should be well-organized, clearly written, and appropriately referenced. Inattention to the fundamentals of writing always detracts from your ability to communicate. Format and style will always affect my evaluation of your written work.

1. Content - Papers should follow an orderly, logical progression and include an introduction, a main body, and conclusion (at a minimum). "Being well organized" means that each paragraph should build upon the previous one(s) and that within paragraphs, sentences follow an orderly progression of ideas. Because most people write on word processors or computers, take advantage of this technology to produce several drafts of your paper. Your initial drafts can take the form of brain-storming and note-taking, but beyond this stage, you must take care to thoughtfully construct your arguments, systematically support them with evidence, and present them in a logical order in clear prose. 

2. Format and Style - At the top of the first page, include an interesting, informative, and/or creative title (not just "Research Paper"), along with your name, my name (Professor Moss), and the date. Papers should be double-spaced, typewritten, and with one-inch margins and 12 point font. Please do not submit papers in plastic or other types of folders; please do not paper-clip your paper. I prefer that you simply staple your paper securely. Number all pages. Use correct punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. For those who may have trouble with writing fundamentals, get a copy of E.B. White's short book, The Elements of Style, which addresses common errors of grammar and syntax. When I grade your papers I will simply underline sentence-level errors.

3. Proper Citation of Sources - Follow the anthropological conventions for citations. You must cite the source for a specific idea, paraphrases, and verbatim quotes, using page numbers (for example, Bernick 1998:145). In a research paper of the type you are writing for this class, you should avoid frequent and/or lengthy quotes. Learn to paraphrase, but be careful to preserve the author's intended meaning. Please adhere to the citation style used in the journal American Anthropologist; one of your assigned readings is my article published in this journal to which you can refer. Always include a "References Cited" section. This is not a list of books and articles you've read, but those you have cited in your paper. Everything you cite should be on this list, and nothing should be on this list that you do not cite. Also please see the wonderful webpage designed by J.Q. Johnson that defines plagiarism and provides great examples of how to paraphrase an author's idea properly: <http://libweb.uoregon.edu/guides/plagiarism/students/>. To cite internet sources, cite author, date, title, with complete URL, and a statement as to when you accessed it. For example,

Keddie, Grant (1996) Aboriginal Defensive Sites (Parts 1-4). Discovery Magazine. Online at http://www.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/Content_Files/Files/AboriginalDefensiveSitesarticleOct2006.pdf , accessed September 18, 2007.

4. Always proofread your hard copy. Proofreading on the computer screen is not the same as proofreading your printed version. Always proofread your work after you have printed it for the final time. Do not assume that everything is fine once you've sent your latest draft to the printer. If you find a few minor mistakes, please correct them on the hard copy using a pen. Your peer reviewers and I will appreciate it, even if you cannot print again and hand-in a "pristine copy."  

5. Make a copy of everything you submit to protect yourself from inadvertent loss.

Research Paper - Writing to Learn

The reason we write is to communicate. When we write, we clarify for ourselves what we are thinking. Take a position on a topic that matters to you. Arguments are necessary when questions are at issue and the answer is potentially in dispute. Writing can lead to solving problems.

These are some of the ideas shared with me by Professor John Gage of the Department of English.

Start by formulating a single research question that can be addressed using archaeological data. By archaeological data I mean everything and anything from stone, shell, bone, and fiber artifacts, to petroglyphs and pictographs, to faunal and floral remains, to sediments and radiocarbon dates, to house and structural remains, to site locations and settlement patterns. I would like you to feel a genuine need to discover something about the topic of your choice. The audience of your paper will include me, your instructor, but also a small group of your peers who will read a draft of your paper and give you feedback. Your final research paper should be 8 pages long, double-spaced, 12 point font, with 1-inch margins. A complete list of references, single-spaced, shall be attached as pages 9-10.

Once you have a question, or at least a topic, start searching for journal articles or book chapters that relate to your topic (secondary sources). Use the index, Anthropological Literature, from the UO Library's webpage. Search by keyword for your topic, or by author if you know someone who has written about the area on which you are focused. I am happy to provide advice as to articles that relate to your interest, especially if you have trouble getting started.

Acquire copies of these journal articles, book chapters, or book excerpts, and read them strategically to see how they might provide information that addresses your interest. Underline relevant points in the articles, write in the margins to summarize ideas or pose questions, and use the references listed at the end of the paper to track down other relevant sources. At this stage you may be investigating site reports and monographs that report original data (primary sources). Be sure to start this process early enough so you can recall books or request them through the Orbis/Cascade/Summit system. As the course progresses and you learn more from assigned reading, class lectures, and discussion, new, unexpected questions may emerge. You may re-formulate your original question based on the data and information you have found. Write a 100 word abstract that presents your question, approach, and tentative results, and attach a bibliography of a minimum of 5 outside sources by November 12 (week 8).

As you read, develop an outline of your paper. Keep your research question forefront in your mind, and consider how the evidence you have gathered can be organized in a logical sequence that helps you build an argument or thesis statement. Here I am using the term an "argument" to mean a scholarly position that uses evidence to investigate and develop an "answer" to the research question. By now, you should be working with an outline, some of which might evolve into subheads you use to organize your paper. There may not be a single answer to your question, so you can discuss multiple lines of evidence that might lead to different answers. It's also possible that in the exploration of your original question, you may want to show how your thinking has evolved in a way to pose different questions that you can address (if an "answer" to your original question turns out to be unfeasible).

Submit a draft of your research paper to your peer reviewers no later than November 19 (week 9).

Peer Evaluation - Peer working groups of 3-4 students will be established during the first week of class. This group will serve as a discussion group during much of the term, when we break down into small groups to share comments and ideas about course readings. The main function of the group will be to serve as peer reviewers on drafts of research papers. When you review another writer's work, you evaluate it, criticize it, suggest improvements, and communicate your comments to the writer. Peer reviewing is an essential part of the scholarly process, but is also a part of the workday world in business and government. You want to support your peers with positive, "coaching" comments, but you also want to provide constructive criticism to help them improve. Through peer reviewing, 1) you will learn some Northwest Coast archaeology by reading the work of your peers, and 2) this process should result in better papers. The main benefit for you, however, is that by internalizing feedback you give to others about their writing, you will become a better editor of your own writing. To develop into a good writer, you must learn to be a good self-editor. Writing for each other (as well as for me) will also provide a concrete sense of audience. Knowing your audience is another key component of good writing.

Here is the rubric you will use in evaluating each other's papers:

  1. Research question(s). Does the background begin with a statement of broader interest to draw the reader in? Is it interesting? What might make it more interesting? Is there a better way to phrase the research question to make it crystal clear? Does the thesis statement or argument intrigue you?
  2. Is the relevant archaeological research summarized systematically? Does the writer provide adequate context for you to understand how the cited sources bear on the research question(s)? Are the archaeological sites and the data they contain described in adequate detail? Is there enough support for the claims made? What needs work? What is missing? Does the paper make good use of 3-5 outside sources in addition to course readings? What additional information could be included so that this paper makes more sense to you?
  3. Organization - Does the argument progress logically? What could improve the structure or development of the argument? Do the sections of the paper follow each other in logical order? Is each section well-organized? What could be changed to make the paper flow better?
  4. Grammar, punctuation, capitalization, etc. Make suggestions on the paper that will help clarify the writing. Underline ungrammatical sentences, misspellings, and typographical errors that the writer needs to change.
  5. Does the References Cited section cite all sources? Does is follow the format used in the course syllabus or American Anthropologist?
  6. Conclusion - Does the writer provide sufficient closure of his/her analysis of the research question? Does the paper end with impact? Having finished reading the paper, look back at the title. Does the paper's title capture the paper's content?
  7. Assessment - What did you learn from this paper that you did not know before? What about this paper resonated with you?

Each student will prepare a peer review of two papers written by other members of his/her group. Peer reviews can be handwritten on a two page form (listing the 7 areas above) that I will hand out in class on November 7. In class that day, we will spend some time discussing this rubric and small groups will decide how they will manage the logistics of exchanging papers. Small groups will also discuss those factors they would like to consider when providing feedback to group members. As mentioned above, you submit draft research papers to your peer reviewers no later than November 19 (week 9). Peer reviews are due in class on November 26 (week 10). Bring two copies of each of your peer reviews to class; one you will turn in to me, and the other will be returned to authors with marked-up copies of papers. On that day, you will have time to provide additional feedback to each other. The next stage is to revise. In the words of John Gage (2003, pers. comm.), "rewriting is not simply the act of correcting, editing or formatting a product. It is rethinking, redrafting, reshaping, even changing one's mind." Also recall that writing is recursive; you revise your thoughts based on the understandings you come to from the act of writing itself, which require you to return to earlier formulations, requiring you to rethink and rephrase.

Final research papers are due no later than December 5. Please submit hard copies only. Late assignments will be penalized 2 points for each day late.

We will discuss appropriate research questions for writing papers in class, but you are welcome to discuss your ideas with me during office hours. I encourage you to consider using a Northwest Coast archaeological topic in the news as a stimulus to your research question. You might also evaluate a TV program or website using course information.

 

Barbara Bundy Maps - Grayscale

Barbara Bundy Maps - Color

Other Useful Maps

LINKS TO NORTHWEST COAST WEBSITES

ANTH 542

NORTHWEST COAST ARCHAEOLOGY FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

REQUIRED READING: The required reading is the same as that of the undergraduates, with the addition of the articles listed below for specific dates. You will also be reading additonal materials for your term papers.

For 10/3
Erlandson, J. M. , M. A. Tveskov, M. L. Moss, and G. B. Wasson (2000) Riverine Erosion and Oregon Coast Archaeology: a Pistol River Case Study. In Changing Landscapes: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Coquille Cultural Preservation Conference, 1999, edited by R. J. Losey, pp. 3-18. Coquille Indian Tribe, North Bend, OR.

Losey, R. J. (2005) Earthquakes and tsunami as elements of environmental disturbance on the Northwest Coast of North America . Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24(2):101-116.

For 10/17
Erlandson, J. M. (2002) Anatomically Modern Humans, Maritime Adaptations, and the Peopling of the New World. In The First Americans: The Pleistocene Colonization of the New World, edited by Nina Jablonski. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences. San Francisco.

For 10/22
Moss, M. L. (1998) Northern Northwest Coast Regional Overview. Arctic Anthropology 35(1):88-111.

For 10/24
Moss, M. L. (2004) The Status of Archaeology and Archaeological Practice in Southeast Alaska in Relation to the Larger Northwest Coast. Arctic Anthropology 41(2):177-196.

Moss, Madonna L., Jon M. Erlandson, R. Scott Byram, and Richard E. Hughes 1996 The Irish Creek Site: Evidence for a Mid-Holocene Microblade Component on the Northern Northwest Coast. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 20:75-92.

Moss, Madonna L. and Jon M. Erlandson 1995 Reflections on North American Pacific Coast Prehistory. Journal of World Prehistory 9(1):1-45.

For 10/31
Moss, Madonna L., Jon M. Erlandson, and Robert Stuckenrath 1990 Wood Stake Weirs and Salmon Fishing on the Northwest Coast: Evidence from Southeast Alaska. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 14:143-158.

Eldridge, M. and S. Acheson (1992) Antiquity of fish weirs on the southern coast: a response to Moss, Erlandson, and Stuckenrath. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 16:112-116.

Monks, G. G. (1987) Prey as bait: the Deep Bay example. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 11:119-142.

Cannon, A. and D. Yang (2006) Early storage and sedentism on the Pacific Northwest coast : ancient DNA analysis of salmon remains from Namu, British Colombia. American Antiquity 71(1):123-140.

For 11/21
Keddie, Grant (1996) Aboriginal Defensive Sites (Parts 1-4). Discovery Magazine. Online at
http://www.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/Content_Files/Files/AboriginalDefensiveSitesarticleOct2006.pdf

Other Northwest Coast Related Publications of Potential Interest to Graduate Students:

Moss, M. L. (2007) Haida and Tlingit Use of Seabirds from the Forrester Islands, Southeast Alaska. Journal of Ethnobiology 27(1):28-45.

Moss, M. L. (2007) The Killisnoo Picnicground Midden (49-SIT-124) Revisited: Assessing Archaeological Recovery of Vertebrate Faunal Remains from Northwest Coast Shell Middens. Journal of Northwest Anthropology 41(1):1-17.

Bowers, P. M. and M. L. Moss (2006) A Giant in the Rainforest: Frederica de Laguna's Contributions to the Anthropology of Southeast Alaska. Arctic Anthropology 43(2)63-77.

Moss, M. L., Yang, D. Y., Newsome, S. D., Speller, C. F., McKechnie, I., McMillan, A. D., Losey, R. J., and Koch, P. L. (2006). Historical Ecology and Biogeography of North Pacific Pinnipeds: Isotopes and Ancient DNA from Three Archaeological Assemblages. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 1(2):165-190.

Moss, M. L., T. J. Connolly, J. M. Erlandson, and G. L. Tasa (2006) An Early Holocene/Late Pleistocene Archaeological Site on the Oregon Coast? Comments on Hall et al. 2005. Radiocarbon 48(2):237-240.

Moss, M. L. (2005) Tlingit Horticulture: an Indigenous or Introduced Development? In: Keeping it Living: Traditions of Plant Use and Cultivation on the Northwest Coast of North America, edited by Douglas Deur and Nancy J. Turner, pp. 274-295. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

Newton, R. G. and M. L. Moss (2005) Haa Atxaayi Haa Kusteeyix Sitee, Our Food is our Tlingit Way of Life: Excerpts of Oral Interviews. USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region, R10-MR-30, March 2005. Juneau, AK.

Moss, M. L. (2004) Island societies are not always insular: Tlingit territories in the Alexander Archipelago and the adjacent Alaskan mainland. In Voyages of Discovery: the Archaeology of Islands, edited by Scott M. Fitzpatrick, pp. 165-183. Greenwood Press, Westport, CN.

Moss, M. L. (2004) Archaeological Investigation of Cape Addington Rockshelter: Human Occupation of the Rugged Seacoast on the Outer Prince of Wales Archipelago, Alaska. University of Oregon Anthropological Paper No. 63. University of Oregon, Eugene. For order information, see <http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~anthro/pubs/UOpapers03.html>

Lepofsky, D., N. Lyons, and M. L. Moss 2003 The Use of Driftwood on the North Pacific Coast: an Example from Southeast Alaska. Journal of Ethnobiology 23(1):125-141.

Erlandson, J. M., R. Losey, M. L. Moss and M. A. Tveskov 2002 A Radiocarbon Chronology for the Bullards Beach Site (35-CS-2/3), A Lower Coquille Village in Coos County, Southern Oregon Coast. Journal of Northwest Anthropology 36(1):113-124.

Moss, M. L. and J. M. Erlandson 2001 The Archaeology of Obsidian Cove, Suemez Island, Southeast Alaska. Arctic Anthropology 38(1):27-47.

Lepofsky, D., M. L. Moss, and N. Lyons 2001 The Unrealized Potential of Paleoethnobotany in the Archaeology of Northwestern North America: Perspectives from Cape Addington Rockshelter, Southeast Alaska. Arctic Anthropology 38(1):48-59.

Erlandson, J. M. and M. L. Moss 2001 Shellfish Feeders, Carrion Eaters, and the Archaeology of Aquatic Adaptations. American Antiquity 66(3):413-432.

Bowers, P. M. and M. L. Moss 2001 The North Point Wet Site and the Subsistence Importance of Pacific Cod on the Northern Northwest Coast. In People and Wildlife in Northern North America: Essays in Honor of R. Dale Guthrie, edited by S. Craig Gerlach and Maribeth S. Murray, pp. 159-177. BAR- British Archaeological Report International Series 944.

Moss, M. L. and J. M. Erlandson 2000 Wolf's Lair: Middle and Late Holocene Wooden Artifacts from a Sea Cave on Baker Island, Alaska. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 24:107-128.

Moss, M. L. 2000 Changes in Tlingit Food Production after Contact. In: Culture Contact and Change in Arctic and Subarctic Areas of Asia and North America. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska 25(1):39-47.

Moss, M. L. 1999 Engendering Archaeology in the Pacific Northwest. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 33(2):245-262.

Erlandson, J. M. and M. L. Moss 1999 The Systematic Use of Radiocarbon Dating in Archaeological Surveys in Coastal and Other Erosional Environments. American Antiquity 64(3):431-443.

Erlandson, J. M., M. A. Tveskov and M. L. Moss 1997 Return to Chetlessenten: the Antiquity and Architecture of an Athapaskan Village on the Southern Northwest Coast. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 19(2):226-240.

Erlandson, J. M. and M. L. Moss 1996 The Pleistocene - Holocene Transition along the Pacific Coast of North America. In Humans at the End of the Ice Age: the Archaeology of the Pleistocene - Holocene Transition, edited by Lawrence Straus, B. Eriksen, J.M. Erlandson, and D.R. Yesner, pp. 277-301. Plenum Press, New York.

Erlandson, J. M. and M. L. Moss 1995 Chronology and Subsistence Change at the Oceanside Site (35-TI-47), Tillamook County, Oregon. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 29(2):221-227.

Erlandson, J. M., M. L. Moss, and R. Hughes 1992 Archaeological Distribution and Trace Element Geochemistry of Volcanic Glass from Obsidian Cove, Suemez Island, Southeast Alaska. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 16:89-95.

Moss, M. L. and J. M. Erlandson (editors) 1992 Maritime Cultures of Southern Alaska: Papers in Honor of Richard H. Jordan. Arctic Anthropology 29(2).

Moss, M. L. 1992 Relationships Between Maritime Cultures of Southern Alaska: Re-thinking Culture Area Boundaries. In: Maritime Cultures of Southern Alaska: Papers in Honor of Richard H. Jordan. Arctic Anthropology 29(2):5-17.

Moss, M. L., J. M. Erlandson, and Robert Stuckenrath 1989 The Antiquity of Tlingit Settlement on Admiralty Island, Southeast Alaska. American Antiquity 54(3):534-543.

Moss, M. L. 1986 Native American Religious Use in the Pacific Northwest: a Case Study from the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 20(2):191-201.

Moss, M. L. 1985 Phosphate Analysis of Archaeological Sites, Admiralty Island, Southeast Alaska. Syesis 17:95-100. 

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Graduate students will take all chapter tests and write one term paper on a archaeological topic of your choice. I would like you to choose a geographic or topical area of the Northwest Coast with which you have had little familiarity prior to this class. This paper will be a 11-13 page critical review of the literature relevant to your topic. You can follow the guidelines set for the undergraduate research paper, but yours will be longer, more substantial, use more sources, and be written at a higher level. I invite you to meet in person with me to discuss your progress on your paper topics early in the term. Graduate students will form their own group, and proceed with the same peer review process set up for the undergraduates.

GRADUATE STUDENT CLASS SCHEDULE

I would like to give you additional time to discuss graduate readings, your research papers, etc., outside of our regular class meetings. I propose to meet on three Fridays at 2:00 pm: October 19, November 2, and November 16. Please confirm with me that you can make these dates. Graduate student research papers (and associated tasks) have the same deadlines as do undergraduate papers.

GRADING FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

Graduate student grades will be based on a percentage of 250 points: 

3 Chapter Tests @ 30 points each

90 points

Participation

30 points

Term Paper

100 points

Peer Reviews

30 points