medsticker What you need to know about measure 66 and 67 Most other states aren’t envious of Oregon’s tax structure which relies heavily on an unstable income tax. Recently it’s weaknesses have been underscored by a weak economy. While income taxes are progressive (taxing the wealthy instead of the poor) they have one major drawback, when the economy suffers the taxable income decreases, making our State legislature struggle to find funding sources for our most needed social programs. Facing an $852 million dollar cut in the state budget, Democrats worked diligently last year to pass Tax Fairness legislation. The increase in taxes will only affect those who can afford it; wealthy Oregonians sharing the burden while our poor economy recovers.  According to Defend Oregon 97.5% of Oregonians won’t see their taxes increase.

Without hesitation conservative ideologues quickly responded by creating the maligned group Oregonians Against Job Killing Taxes. Acting under their deceptive name, they gathered enough signatures to put the tax increases on the ballot.

So here’s the facts:

  • A “no” vote will cut 3 million dollars from the University of Oregon’s budget. Making another tuition increase imminent.
  • A “Yes” vote will preserve public services we need most including education, health, and safety.
  • A “Yes” vote will tax those who can afford it, wealthy Oregonians making over $250,000 a year.
  • The Oregon Corporate Minimum tax has not been increased since 1931. A “no” vote will keep it at $10. Fact: Adjusted for inflation $10 in 1931 would be equal to $140 in 2008.
  • A “Yes” vote will raise the Corporate Minimum tax to $150, preserving funds for social programs.

Sometimes the boundaries of the University give us the perception of being in a protected square unaltered by the difficult times around us, but this recession has already hit our campus hard. Students, including myself, have seen a 7.9% increase in our tuition and the threat of another hike is very real. Classified staff that we rely on are being forced to take furlough days equal to pay cuts and our professors are underpaid compared to universities of equal size, seriously threatening our schools ability to hire and retain the best teachers.

A “no” vote will only exacerbate the problems we as students already face; increasing our tuition, and cutting programs and services we need most.

In January vote “Yes” on measure 66 and 67. Your vote will count.

Sign the pledge:

Your Vote Counts!

Your Vote Counts!

  • Share/Bookmark
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

Today House Democrats unveiled their Health Care bill which includes a “robust” public option. Fueled by ressurging confidence from progressives on the left, House Democrats are moving forward with what is clearly the most comprehensive  health care plan to date. Unlike the Baucus bill which leaves millions without insurance, the House bill will cover 96% of Americans extending coverage to nearly 45 million uninsured. Forcing private for-profit insurance companies to compete with a public option will reduce costs without sacrificing quality – a win-win scenario. New regulations and requirements will make insurance companies cover those with pre-existing conditions, cap out-of-pocket expenses, and protect people from being dropped when they need it most. The bill will also allow parents to keep their children on their plans until they are 26, giving us young folk time to find a job with benefits.

At first glance the price tag seems daunting coming in at an estimated $896 billion dollars, however Democratic leadership has made it clear that it won’t add to the deficit. To cover its costs the bill will raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans (those earning $500k individually, or $1 million combined), instead of taxing what have become known as “cadillac plans.” Increased tax revenue led the congressional budgeting office to predict that the bill will reduce the federal deficit by $30 million over the next 10 years.

Do you want to see a public option in the final health care bill?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

In an effort at transparency, Democrats have agreed to publish the 2000 page bill online for a period of 72 hours starting Monday. This means we can expect floor debate on the bill as early as next week.

The “no party” is already attempting to frame the bill as a government takeover of the health care industry, which worked early on when we were just becoming educated on the issue, but now with over 60% of Americans in full support of a public option it seems like a losing strategy. Hopefully some Republicans will have a change of heart when it comes time to vote, if not for bipartisanship, than just to prove that they’re empathetic human beings. Given the saliency of the issue if the “no party” chooses not support the bill and it’s successful, than we can expect several years of Democratic leadership on the Hill and in the White House.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

Would you prefer a Carbon Tax or a Cap and Trade Mechanism?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
For many years we have had a debate about how to solve the problem of fossil fuel pollution. We have seen many topdown micromanaging regulations, such as limits on the miles-per-gallon in new automobiles, lightbulb regulations, subsidies to “green collar” industries, and others. A debate also exists about the proper replacement for fossil fuels, whether it be solar, wind, geothermal, nuclear, etc…

carbon tax 1 Carbon Tax is the Better Solution

Right now, Congress is considering cap-and-trade, which would limit the amount a pollutant can be used, in this case, carbon. Companies would need to have carbon credits to pollute, and the credits represent one ton of carbon dioxide. If companies wish to increase their pollution, they would need to buy credits from those who pollute less than their credits allow. All these policies might be better than nothing, but that says very little. A carbon tax is the better solution, due to its incentives and the fact that it treats the disease, not the symptoms.”

Continue reading…


  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with: